普罗米修斯

Reese's $25,000 promotion may violate sweepstakes laws_我的网站

一 |     Reese’s may be in violation of state and federal laws with its new sweepstakes offer currently advertised on packs of peanut butter cups.The promotion on two-cup packages reads “You could win $25,000” and, in smaller print, “See details inside.” But only after consumers have bought and opened a package can they see the small print: no purchase is necessary to enter the sweepstakes.The Reese's contest was first reported Monday by Edgar Dworsky, a consumer advocate and former assistant attorney general in Massachusetts, who runs the Consumer World website.Hershey Co., that Pennsylvania candymaker that owns the Reese’s brand, didn’t immediately respond to telephone and email messages left Monday by The Associated Press.Sweepstakes are primarily governed by state laws, which require that no purchase is necessary to participate. A contest that requires a purchase is a lottery, which is subject to different rules.Three federal agencies __ Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. Postal Service __ also enforce laws governing sweepstakes depending on the medium. The Postal Service requires mailed sweepstakes offers to make clear that no purchase is necessary, for example. The FTC doesn't govern sweepstakes specifically, but has broad laws prohibiting “unfair and deceptive acts.”The FTC said Monday that it can’t comment on the practices of particular companies outside of an investigation. It wouldn’t confirm or deny an investigation against Hershey.Dworsky said a sign near Reese’s candy displays making clear that no purchase is necessary might meet legal requirements. But a spot check of candy displays in multiple states __ including California, Virginia and Washington __ found no such signs.Dworsky noted that Reese's ran a similar promotion earlier this year that ended in April using the same packaging. Some of those packages are still for sale, even though the sweepstakes code has expired, he said.Dworsky said he's concerned that the packaging could lure consumers into thinking they need to buy it.“You never have to pay to play. All these packages should be recalled," he said.。     8 月 25 日消息，据用户反馈，小米手机的服务价格及服务政策再次迎来调整。在非保修条款中，不属于三包范围的情况删除了关于二手产品 / 商品的相关表述。不过，服务权益中的「只换不修」和「电池保」依然保留相关条款。用户享有权益的手机，发生过任何回收业务、转售情况及赠予或转交第三方使用的也不能享受只换不修 / 电池保。注：三包政策是指销售者、修理者、生产者依据《中华人民共和国产品质量法》《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》等有关规定，应当承担部分商品的修理、更换、退货的责任和义务。消费者购买的产品出现以下情况，有权要求经销者承担三包责任。1．不具备产品应当具备的使用性能，而事先没有说明的；2．不符合明示采用的产品标准要求；3．不符合以产品说明、实物样品等方式表明的质量状况；4．产品经技术监督行政部门等法定部门检验不合格；5．产品修理两次仍不能正常使用。

二 | ▲ 开箱：小米 17 Pro / Pro Max 手机图赏相关阅读：。

Current article:http://c44.kenouguanruilianshanxiangshu.cfd/news/20260826_65172.html

Published on:06:16:31